Women have to march
Women have to march if the world survives, there will come a day when International Women’s Day (IWD) will be more than a historical curiosity: a reminder of the troubled times when more than half of humanity fought against demotion to lower-class status. But it can take a long time.
More than 110 years after the concept emerged in the United States and Europe and almost 40 years after it was adopted by the United Nations, IWD annually commemorates the persistence of gender inequality almost everywhere.
Significant advances in some geographic jurisdictions must be balanced against setbacks in others. Afghanistan has established itself as a uniquely backward entity since the Taliban took power and has begun to demonstrate that its mentality has not deviated from the horribly backward stance of its original 1990s incarnation.
Girls’ schooling is sporadic at best, universities are closed, and restrictions on women have to march employment have paralyzed aid and health initiatives. Just last month, there was a contraceptive crackdown that was allegedly viewed as a Western conspiracy to contain the Muslim population.
Echoes of a similar mentality cannot be ignored in the United States, where legal repression of abortion rights has been followed by anti-contraceptive campaigns. In the United States, the field of dislike is much broader. But this trend, often framed in gibberish, reflects traditional misogyny that’s commonly seen as prevalent in many belief systems.
How long will women have to march for their rights?
However, there are major differences between them. For example, girls’ education in Iran has never been fully curtailed, although women have to march rights have previously been curtailed in other ways.
Most visible was the emphasis on headgear – never quite as drastic as the Saudi injunction, which effectively enforces invisibility but is still strictly enforced by Iran’s brand of “moral police”.
This dam was breached after the assassination of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurd who was rescued last September because her hijab went against church standards. It unleashed a wave of protests that began in Amin’s hometown of Saqqez, spread across Iran, and continued sporadically, including the alleged sexual assault of suspected activists, despite an insidious backlash of repression ranging from executions to mass incarceration and torture.
One of the results was the abandonment of the compulsory hijab, even though many who are reluctant to give up support their sisters’ right to choose differently. And the authorities no longer seem to want to enforce their order.
They also appear concerned about recent cases of mass poisoning of female students, hundreds of whom have been treated in hospitals for an unspecified illness. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also called it an “unforgivable crime” this week.
The same applies to the actions of the Iranian state, particularly its crimes against women. Indeed, levels of misogyny appear to be common to all faiths.
For example, obscurantist adherents of Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot be excused. But Abrahamic religions remain dominant around the world, and to varying degrees, many of their adherents knowingly or otherwise classify women have to march as inferior to men. As recently as 120 years ago, such attitudes were more or less common, but in some parts of the world, they have been corrected significantly.
Elsewhere, one cannot ignore a sharp regression, not only in Afghanistan and Iran but also in parts of Eastern Europe and the American heartland, where the dystopian fantasy of The Handmaid’s Tale n isn’t a reality but doesn’t seem that far away. . more… downloaded. Pakistan is definitely in the regressive camp, as evidenced by the annual controversies surrounding the Aurat March in recent years.
There was never anything resembling a golden age, but the spell that fell with the rise of the Ziaul Haq dictatorship was never fully lifted.
This is reflected not only in the medieval mentality of the Taliban and their ilk, or in the misogyny of Imran Khan, but also in the attitude of those who sadly felt that Hay’s reversal in Lahore this year should take precedence over women have to march fighting for freedom fighting mankind. Legislation.
However, it should be remembered that the course of history can change without warning. Little did the women have to march who marched desperately to Petrograd on International Women’s Day in 1917, that their protest would spark a revolution that would overthrow tsarism in days and pave the way for a destructive new order months later.
The founder of the IWD, the German socialist and Bolshevik Clara Zetkin would probably appreciate the “zan, zindagi, azadi” slogans that have been pounding around Iran lately.